Metadata sub-meeting (at MathDL meeting), 3/17/01:
3 levels of classification for mathematics taxonomies:
Unify 2 and 3
Discussion of IEEE (will be adopted by IMS and ADL):
metadata categories and the needs of the various Mathematics digital libraries
In summary, there are few extensions to the newest IEEE model, working version 6, that we agreed on in the metadata meetings. As an aside, history indicates that the IEEE model will be the basis, if not wholly adopted, as the newest IMS LOM and incorporated into ADL’S SCORM document.
The numbering scheme in the following notes are references to the IEEE model. Items highlighted in red are recommended extensions to the IEEE metadata standards. Our agreement was that these extensions will be adopted by the Mathematics digital libraries (represented by this group) and we recommend their adoption by the entire NSDL initiative. Other notes are comments and/or discussion items.
Recommend source be identified as LOMDL
2.1 version: Should we have a universal versioning system adopted when IMS adopts the guid? Should we have a versioning system that is shared throughout nsdl? Should we use this element to describe the author’s versioning system?
How do we handle the ripple effect of granular objects having a version change?
2.2 no additions
2.3 no additions
section 3 implies registry of metadata
4.2 size: the size of what it would take to download (in bytes) in an uncompressed manner
4.4.1 We recommend five types: operating system, browser, hardware, plug-in, and software
Section 5
Sections 6 – 9 No additions